Children need to be smacked

0
471
When all other forms of chastisement have failed a smack to the arm or leg tells a child in no uncertain terms that their bad behaviour won't be tolerated

When I was a child I was given a smack if I did something wrong. That usually meant I wouldn’t do it again. Or I’d wise up and make sure I didn’t get caught next time around. Smacking is not cruel, abusive or a sign of lazy parenting, yet this week, Dr. Sally Holland, the Children’s Commissioner for Wales reiterated her call for a smacking ban.
She says that reprimanding naughty children in this way doesn’t have a place in civilised society and is a human rights issue. What bunkum! Sure, if you punch your child’s lights out that is abuse but why should society have to legislate for a tiny majority who do abuse their charges? There are always going to be horrible parents.
And sometimes, a smack is exactly what is needed to keep a child safe. For example, if they try to play with fire or run towards the traffic after a loud and firm ā€œnoā€ hasn’t worked. When all other forms of chastisement have failed, such as withdrawing treats, a smack to the arm or leg tells a child in no uncertain terms that their bad behaviour won’t be tolerated.
I have seen far too many parents pleading with their kids to be good: ā€œplease, please Timmy, don’t do that againā€ instead of disciplining them. The danger of such a weak approach is that it can harm their development and risks turning children into arrogant teenagers and adults with no respect for anyone. So, letā€™s give our support to parents who smack their children and stop this nonsense about bringing in a ban.

SHARE
Previous articleAuld Lang Syne
Next articlePraising pud wines

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.